Saturday, March 13, 2010

So What Makes a Dude Officially "Undateable"? (And Why Can't I Wear My Sunglasses at Night?)

That's the subject of a new book (titled, you guessed it, "Undateable") that comes out on Tuesday (link to New York Post story below). Apparently according to the book, some of the things that can make a guy undateable include, but are certainly not limited to, the following:

-Crude and/or out-of-style clothing.
-Wearing sunglasses at night or indoors.
-Use of satin sheets.
-Ed Hardy wear.
-"Girlie," emo, Gothic or faux-hawk hairstyle.
-Gold chains.
-Repeatedly swiping condiments from restaurant tables (but apparently once or twice is OK).
-Sporting guylights, mandanas and/or jorts.
-Using bluetooth outside your car.
-Novelty belt buckles.
-Cellphone holsters.
-Jean shorts.
-Bad toupee.

Interesting list. For the record, I would never wear a toupee. But apart from that, I got no comment over here.

Friday, March 12, 2010

Delusional.

I note that the new talking point that seems to be coming out of Obama & The Dems today goes something like this: "Since republicans keep trying to give us advice and tell us that it will be bad for us in November if we pass health care, then that must mean that the opposite is true and that the American people really want this bill."

Say what? Regardless, it's not just those vile, awful republicans who are warning how bad it will be for the dems in November if they ram this legislation through against the will of the American people. I note a piece today by two democrat pollsters, Doug Schoen and Patrick Caddell (link below), sounding the very same warning. Here's an excerpt:

"Their blind persistence in the face of reality threatens to turn this political march of folly into an electoral rout in November. In the wake of the stinging loss in Massachusetts, there was a moment when the president and the Democratic leadership seemed to realize the reality of the health-care situation. Yet like some seductive siren of Greek mythology, the lure of health-care reform has arisen again. As pollsters to the past two Democratic presidents, Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinton, respectively, we feel compelled to challenge the myths that seem to be prevailing in the political discourse and to once again urge a change in course before it is too late. At stake is the kind of mainstream, common-sense Democratic Party that we believe is crucial to the success of the American enterprise."

So will Obama & The Dems listen to a couple of their own? Yeah right.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/03/11/AR2010031102904.html

Thursday, March 11, 2010

Rush Slimebaugh Today Says the University of Missouri Has "One of the World's Great Marxist Journalism Schools." Them's Fightin' Words!

(BTW, he lumped the J-Schools of Columbia University and one or two other schools into the same description). So what's the best way to debunk the mindless and outlandish accusations of a far-right freak like Slimebaugh (or, for that matter, a far-left freak)? Well, through the facts, such as the observations of an individual with first-hand, personal knowledge of the very situation to which the allegation pertains. That would be Yours Truly, a proud 1990's graduate of the oldest and best journalism school in the country -- the one located at the University of Missouri-Columbia ("MU").

I will start by saying that apart from the copy of The Communist Manifesto that we received at the start of MU J-School (not!), I oddly enough never received any Marxist training at the MU J-School, nor did any of my many professors there ever talk about Marxism or Marxist principles. They did talk a lot about journalistic principles -- principles that I often complain in this space are way too often ignored these days, at least at the national media level. It was at the MU J-School that I learned that while we all have our own opinions, biases and perhaps certain ideologies, a journalist does his/her best at all times to divorce those items from his/her news coverage (unless of course he/she is providing editorial commentary or news analysis clearly labeled as such).

It was also there that I was exposed to a broad diversity of world views and perspectives from my fellow journalism students, ranging from thoughtful, intelligent conservatives to equally thoughtful and intelligent liberals. I was basically a kid then who had done very little thinking for himself, and frankly you could pretty accurately describe me as a liberal back then. I still can recall those wonderful political discussions and arguments with my good friend and devout republican Brett (a huge Rush Slimebaugh fan, BTW) down at Shakepeare's Pizza after our Friday night KBIA shift. Good friend Josh would go with us, and Josh and I would kind of gang up on Brett, but he damn sure always held his own very well. And he gave me reason to think, and at times to re-evaluate, and more importantly to realize that viewing the world through the lense of partisan blinders is a very anti-intellectual way of going about things. Other conservatives there like a certain larger-than-life, Elvis-loving figure named Strauss had the same impact. Did they ever convert me over to the Dark Side? No. But they played just as big of a role in the person that I am today as anyone ever did. And I thank them for that.

To summarize, my experience at the MU J-School was a highly fun period of years of being exposed to entire panoply of human ideas and world views. It was wonderfully educational and character-shaping. Were there likely more left-leaning folks there in total than there were right-leaning folks? Probably so -- the same as at most newsrooms across the country. And there's nothing wrong with that. If you endeavor to always aspire to the core principles of good journalism, then I don't give a rat's behind what your political persuasion happens to be.

And just one final note in retort to Slimebaugh's drivel from today: Of the literally hundreds of folks -- both future journalists and professors alike -- whom I met and got to know during my years the MU J-School, I can honestly say that I did not so much as run across even one Marxist! Actually, I would have liked to, because it would have been fascinating to know such a person, even if I think such a world view is so completely wrong, dangerous and out-of-place for an intelligent human being. But I would have listened, probably laughed at him/her a fair amount, and would have tried to express to him/her why I think that world view should be eschewed. Hey, I always like meeting new kinds of people! But unfortunately, meeting Marxists and being exposed to Marxist thought is simply something that never happened at the University of Missouri-Columbia Journalism School. Sorry, Slimebaugh.

You Say Tomato, But I say OUCH!!!

I've noticed in recent days that you can't find a decent price on full-sized fresh tomatoes. I don't like to ever pay more than $2/lb. for tomatoes, but at present I can't find any for less than $2.25 or $2.50/lb. Well, the explanation has emerged over the past day. It seems there was a February freeze in Florida that ruined 70% of the tomato crop (link below). (BTW: February freezes in Florida? I think the U.S. Senate really needs to focus on ramming through the Cap'n Trade bill, as Obama is apparently quietly pushing now. Yeah right, what a priority! But I digress).

The tomato price hike is bad news for me, since I eat tomatoes like they are going out of style. They are one of the healthiest foods out there, and I couldn't make my Slimeball Sandwiches without them. The linked story says there will be no relief in these high prices for at least 4-6 weeks. For any fellow tomato lovers out there, here's one suggestion: For now, you might go with the smaller Roma tomatoes. Their price has risen a bit too, but they are (as is typically the case) cheaper than full-size tomatoes and even this week I'm seeing them at some places for only 99 cents/lb. Looks like it may have to be a steady diet of Romas for me for a few months.

http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/fea/taste/shopping/stories/DN-nf_inseason_0310gd.State.Edition1.4bf3f05.html

Wednesday, March 10, 2010

If You Happen to be a Christian Currently Observing Lent & Have the Friday Fish Eatin' Blues, Here's a Little-Known Fact: You Can Eat Beaver!!!

I just stumbled on this little factoid over the past day, which I had never heard before (from the below Wikipedia link):

"In the 17th century, based on a question raised by the Bishop of Quebec, the Roman Catholic Church ruled that the beaver was a fish (beaver flesh was a part of the indigenous peoples' diet, prior to the Europeans' arrival) for purposes of dietary law. Therefore, the general prohibition on the consumption of meat on Fridays during Lent does not apply to beaver meat."

But alas, here's the dilemma: Where in the hell can I buy some Beaver? If you happen to know where I can get me some Beaver, please advise. What sauce or condiment does one even put on a Beaver? Does Beaver taste like fish or like chicken? Or am I just pullin' a Ward Cleaver and bein' a little too hard on The Beaver? You decide. Out.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beaver

Tuesday, March 9, 2010

What's Good 4 the Goose is Good 4 the Gander: I Criticized Newt Gingrich Over Comments Aimed at Nancy Pelosi Last Year, & Today I Say the Same to Her

Gingrich's spewings last year accused Pelosi of being a liar, despicable, dishonest, vicious and trivial. Today's comments from Pelosi accused resigning New York Congressman Eric Massa of being "a very sick person" (first link below). You'll find that I'm an Equal Opportunity critic over here, and in that spirit, I say today to San Fran Nan the same thing I said to Gingrich last year: Pots really should not kettles black. It's just not overly becoming of them.

BTW, check the second link below for my Gingrich/Pelosi post from last year -- a link which also (and much more significantly) sets forth my recipe for a personal culinary invention of mine: The low-fat Slimeball Sandwich. I invented those babies in college (the high fat version), but in recent years have tailored the concoction to a much healthier version. And either way, They Are Delicious!

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aJYii1K41DOE
http://independentrage.blogspot.com/2009/05/gingrich-blasts-pelosi-talk-about.html

Postscript: I watched an interview that Massa gave today to crazy right-winger Glenn Beck, and I gotta tell ya -- Massa is, at a minimum, a bit nuts. But what I did appreciate was his use of a new funny phrase that I have not heard before: "The Whole Schmazole" (sp.). I love that! That's the one of the best ones I've heard since "Jeezal Peezal," circa 1986, from old school baseball Coach Petrillo! And lest we forget as well, "Can of Corn!!!"

Monday, March 8, 2010

"I Was Naked As a Jaybird!" Outgoing NY Congressman Accuses Obama Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel of Accosting Him in a Shower About His Health Care Vote.

Recently resigning Rep. Eric Massa (D-NY) today accuses Obama's Rahm Emanuel of approaching him in a U.S. House gym shower, when both were "naked as a jaybird," to try to bully Massa over his opposition to Obama & The Dems' health care legislation. Massa also accuses Obama & The Dems of "orchestrating his downfall because he voted no on health care reform" and because he remained a deciding vote on health care. Predictably, the far right is jumping all over this today (link below).

So what's the truth here? Who the hell knows. That Emanuel might engage in such thuggery is, frankly, no surprise or shock to me. This guy's made a political career of being an complete a$$hole and a bully. But can you trust Massa's account? Not really. This is a guy who recently voluntarily resigned from the House amid accusations that he sexually harassed a male staffer. So there's not a great deal of credibility in his implied accusation that dems are "forcing him out." Nobody held a gun to his head to resign, and if there was no truth the harassment allegations, then why is he running away? At the same time, and as noted, nothing would really surprise me when it comes to the behavior of Emanuel. My best guess: Some incident between Emanuel and Massa likely occurred, with there being both some grains of truth and some embellishment in Massa's account.

But at the end of the day, what does it really matter? Even if this event did not occur, and even if Massa's charge of dems "bringing his downfall" is a complete red herring, I still say what I've been saying for months, and even since the election of Scott Brown: If you think that the radical-left-progressive-controlled democrat party will not try or do anything it takes to ram through a massive and unpopular heath care bill, then you have not been watching the same group of folks that I've been watching over the past year.

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0310/34096.html

Sunday, March 7, 2010

"Go Ask Alice, When She's 10 Feet Tall" -- Motion Picture "Alice in Wonderland" Shatters Several Box Office Records This Weekend.


(See first linked story below). And just goes to show, what goes around always come back around in American pop culture. The last time "Alice in Wonderland" was cool was the late 1960's (as might be expected -- and no, I wasn't around back then), and its current resurgence immediately brings to mind for me one of my favorite Sixties songs, Jefferson Airplane's "White Rabbit" (with lyrics based upon "Alice in Wonderland"), which famously made an appearance in the interim on the Platoon soundtrack in the mid-1980's (yes, I was around then). Airplane's recognizable version of "White Rabbit" on the old Smothers Brothers TV show is the second link below. BTW, Airplane's lead singer, Grace Slick (pictured immediately above with the rest of her band), was one of the most notorious Rock'n'Roll wild childs in the history of that genre, and she would give even your more contemporary Britney Spears and Courtney Loves of the world a definite run for their money.

http://www.mtv.com/movies/news/articles/1633345/story.jhtml
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WANNqr-vcx0

I'm Having Too Much Fun. But on a Serious Topic, Folks, Watch Out for the Propagandist Media Websites on Both the Far Right & Far Left.

The linked Politico.com story describes two such outfits, the far-left Media Matters (its founder, David Brock, is pictured on the left above) and the far-right Breitbart.com (run by radical right-wing slimeball Andrew Breitbart, pictured on the right above -- the lovely guy who went around tweeting that he was glad Teddy Kennedy was dead on the same day the Old Liberal Lion died -- slimey stuff). If you happen to ever visit and/or read any of the material on any of these far left or far right websites, just make sure you take every single thing they say with a grain of salt. Because it's all cast in spin and in ideology. In other words, the dictionary definition of propaganda. And it spews equally from both extremes. So what would I recommend as a fairly straight-arrow and non-biased source of political commentary and news? None other than the linked Politico.com. Great web site. Even some of my right-wing and left-wing acquaintances agree on that one!

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0310/34016.html

Saturday, March 6, 2010

Glee: "Sick Soccer Mom" in New York Is Ecstatic to Discover She Could Afford a Hit Man's Price to Whack Out Her Hubbie.


(Seems she had previously "lamented she could only afford to maim him"). But the Glee Turns to Glum when she finds out the hit man she propositioned was actually an undercover cop. (Aren't they always? Damn pesky police.) And just for good measure, it's alleged she was Bangin' the Boss at work behind hubbie's back. I wonder if Boss was to be the next hit (since he had apparently just given the woman her walking papers -- the ingrate). In the immortal words of Sheriff Buford T. Justice: "Nice Lady."

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,588247,00.html?test=latestnews

Friday, March 5, 2010

Mickey Rourke: "I Slept With 14 Women ---
All in the Same Night!"

I can only guess that Rourke's lifetime achievements must not quite stack up with the recent revelation that Warren Beatty allegedly bedded almost 13,000 women over a 35-year-period, and thus Rourke found it necessary to brag up his single night record rather than his career totals. By the way, if you actually found the time and energy to sleep with 14 women in the same night, wouldn't you start to lose the precise count after awhile? That's what makes the 14 figure seem a little bit "fishy" to me (and it has nothing to do with health care or the ocean). A bit more credible would have been a claim that "I bedded over 10 ladies one night" or "I slept with around a dozen gals one evening." But what do I know. Maybe dude has one of those photographic memories.

http://www.newyorkpost.com/p/pagesix/rourke_bedded_women_in_one_night_iaA7gNOpk4BLspC5JZRl1M

Thursday, March 4, 2010

April 11: Check Out My Fav Blogger Tionna Smalls in VH1's New Reality Show, "What Chilli Wants"!


The New Show revolves around singer Chilli from TLC fame (pictured immediately above) in her quest to find the right man. Gentlemen, "she is definitely not up for the bullsh*zzz," the linked story reports. "He can't drink, smoke or eat pork," says Chilli. (Incidentally, that pretty much disqualifies the Rager over here since while I have never smoked, the other two criteria are more or less non-starters for me, but I digress).

But also check the New Show in order to see New York City blogger Tionna Smalls (first pic above), who has screen presence out the wazzooo in the linked trailer (below) for the New Show (which is excellent). Tionna even at times visits Mr. Flyover's blog here in order to post a comment. She's one of my favorites, and the Rager commands you to at least take in an episode or two of "What Chilli Wants" and see if it's your cup of tea!

http://bossip.com/222573/chillis-new-reality-show-is-coming-april-11th-what-chilli-wants-in-a-man-may-not-exist/

"Bikini Barista Accused of Selling More Than Just Coffee At an Espresso Stand." I've Heard of Spiking the Coffee, But This Is Ridiculous.

Cops in Washington state say that five baristas (female coffee servers) clad in bikinis have been brewing up more than just coffee at an espresso stand known as "Grab-n-Go." The shenanigans involved alleged prostitution at the Grab-n-Go, including "charging customers for touching certain body parts and stripping down while fixing the coffee." Apparently one of the bikini baristas has copped a deal to rat out the other four in exchange for having her charges dropped.

Know whom the real victim is here? The unsuspecting customer, that's who. He's the guy who hits the ole Grab-n-Go looking for nothing but a nice hot coffee. After sipping on the coffee for a little while, dude decides he'd like a fill-up. So he goes back to the counter and politely asks the bikini barista, "Uh Ma'am, I would like a Top Off please," and then he proceeds to receive much more than he had ever bargained for. Say the guy happens to have high blood pressure -- Can you say Heart Attack City? I for one hope they throw the proverbial coffee pot, errrr book, at these ladies.

http://www.kansascity.com/2010/03/04/1789126/prostition-charge-against-bikini.html
http://www.heraldnet.com/article/20100304/NEWS01/703049783#Bikini.barista.told.to.stay.out.of.trouble.no.jail.time

Wednesday, March 3, 2010

Looks Like Obama & The Dems Will Try to Ram Through a Massive Health Care Bill Using the Nuclear Option.

Based on the words of Obama & The Dems today, it appears that they are prepared to use reconciliation (the "nuclear option," meaning only 51 votes are necessary in the Senate) to jam through a massive and highly unpopular health care bill. What's more, Obama is calling on his minions to get this done in the next two weeks (link below). No surprise there. They want this done before dem lawmakers have to go back home for Spring Break and hear from a lot of angry constituents on this issue. They want to avoid a repeat of the town hall meetings of last August, in which they were actually forced to listen to the American people. Chicken$hit stuff? Most definitely. But no surprise there.

But what about the use of reconciliation? Isn't that a surprise? Not really, since it doesn't appear that dems will try to use that obscure procedural mechanism to pass an entire health care bill. Rather, it appears that they will doing exactly what Dick Morris predicted they would do weeks ago (as discussed then in this space). That is, the Senate version of the bill (which has already passed the Senate) will be passed by the House without any changes. Then the dems will use reconciliation in the Senate to make the changes to the bill that the radical leftist progressives in the House demand. Sure, Obama is talking about tossing in a few republican ideas as well, but that's just window dressing. It will still be the same massive monstrosity of a bill -- just with a few modest republican proposals thrown in on top.

The only good news here is that Obama & The Dems are not assured of success. They may have trouble rounding up enough votes in the House to pass the Senate bill and/or enough votes in the Senate to jam through changes to the Senate bill using the nuclear option. One can only hope.
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0310/33860.html

Tuesday, March 2, 2010

Karl Rove Claiming He & Bush Really Thought There Were WMD's in Iraq. Well, I'm Claiming: He's a Liar.

It's known in certain circles as the "collective facts" doctrine. Meaning, based on everything I've read in recent years, I have little doubt that Bush, Cheney and Rove either knew full well there were no WMD's in Iraq, or at best had no freakin' idea whether there were WMD's in Iraq, but then used the allegation that there were WMD's in Iraq as the pretense to invade a sovereign country, at massive loss of American boys' lives, and pursued that course to try to advance their Neo-Con agenda of spreading American power (they call it "spreading democracy") throughout the world. (BTW, how's that for a bona fide run-on sentence?).

Folks, I'm sorry if you disagree, but I really believe this: As much as I think Obama & The Dems, and the radical left progressive powerbrokers who control them, are Scary for this country, W & His Minions were equally Scary. Alas, what in the hell did we do as average American citizens to deserve such assclowns running things back-to-back? The answer: Nothing. And we should insist upon so much better from our presidents and from our ruling parties.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100302/ap_on_re_us/us_rove_memoir

Monday, March 1, 2010

"Madam Governor?" Manhattan Madam Kristin Davis Tosses Her Top Into the Ring For New York Governor.

Ms. Davis, lest you've forgotten, is the Big Apple Madam who choreographed a regular schedule of ladies of the night to finish off former New York governor Eliot Spitzer. Following her announcement today that she would like to take her "executive" talents to New York's capital city of Albany ("on a pro-marriage equality, prostitution, and pot platform" -- she wants to legalize the latter two items for the tax revenue they'd generate), tonight I watched FoxNews right-winger Sean Hannity trying to tear into The Madam on his show.

An offhand observation from her Hannity appearance tonight: In the current crazy political climate of the country (unlike anything I've seen during my life), and given (1) Ms. Davis' independence (she's not currently affiliated with a party, but may run as a libertarian), (2) her exhibited skill tonight on her feet (yes, she's decent in that position too), and (3) the fact that she's hired a longtime top-level political operative as her campaign adviser, Ms. Davis might just turn out to be a bit dangerous in the New York gubernatorial race. And yes, I am being serious. (Stranger things have happened. See Jesse Ventura). Stay tuned...

http://www.advocate.com/News/News_Features/Madam_Governor_Kristin_Davis/

Sunday, February 28, 2010

This Is Why I Suspect The "Nuclear Option" (AKA "Reconciliation") Is Obama & The Dems' "Big Bluff" When It Comes to Their Health Care Bill...

...Precisely the same thing this apparently honest dem was talking about this weekend (Sen. Kent Conrad (D-ND) (link below)) -- From what I've read on this issue over many months, it would be extremely hard for the dems to ram through a massive, comprehensive bill using the obscure reconciliation procedure due to the myriad procedural roadblocks that the repubs would be able to put up. Now, could the House dems still pass the old Senate version of the bill and then try to use reconciliation to make some modest changes to that bill? Sure, and honestly, that would be a lot more feasible for them. Maybe they in fact have that in mind. That was all the talk about 6 weeks ago. But the recent talk has been about jamming through an entire comprehensive bill (that varies from the old Senate bill) using reconciliation. I think it's doubtful they could do that, as Conrad admits (but for what reason is he admitting it? -- Folks, when it comes to these politicians on both sides, most everything they do is for a self-interested reason, and rarely quite as it appears to be on its face). So, I continue to follow the situation. It's one that seems to change almost every day, just as it has for at least nine months now.

http://www.politico.com/blogs/politicolive/0210/Conrad_Reconciliation_cant_be_used_for_comprehensive_reform.html?showall

Saturday, February 27, 2010

Enough Already! W/ Signs That We Are In No Economic Recovery At All, Obama & The Dems Continue to Focus on Their Massive, Unpopular Health Care Bill.

Today House Speaker Pelosi indicates that they want to continue to focus on their health care legislation over the next 6 weeks. Nothing overly surprising there: I've always maintained that if you've watched how these far left progressives have conducted themselves over the past year, you'd know that their health care aspirations would not go away easily, even after the breaking up of their supermajority in the Senate with Scott Brown's election. They just can't let go, regardless of the continued unpopularity of this legislation throughout the country. They know best for us. We don't. That's the far left world view. And perhaps it might be a bit more tolerable at present if only we didn't have so many other much more pressing issues facing the country right now. I know that Independents are paying attention to this continued silliness by the progressive-controlled dem party. Those same Independents are going to be having some real fun come this fall's elections, I predict.

http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.ce7b18ff74d1dcc6be3181f05e48255b.151&show_article=1

Friday, February 26, 2010

56% of Americans Think Federal Government Poses a Threat to the Rights of Americans. Where's the Shock?

...that according to a new CNN poll (link below). Drudge describes this poll result as a "shock." But why? It's no shock. Not when you have people like Obama's "diversity czar" Mark Lloyd (who has previously expressed admiration for the way Hugo Chavez has controlled the Venezuelan media) running around the FCC. Not when you have a White House that encourages the public to report any person who has a "fishy" opinion concerning health care reform. Not when you have a ruling party that seems dead-set on ramming through massive health care legislation through procedural gimmicks despite the legislation being overwelmingly unpopular with the American people. And of course, I could go on and on, but I'll spare you. Suffice it to say, I haven't been calling these Scary Days for nothing the last several months.

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2010/02/26/cnn-poll-majority-says-government-a-threat-to-citizens-rights/?fbid=0CPSEH9AB0v

Wednesday, February 24, 2010

"Obama Rejects Cries of 'Socialism'." Me: I Wouldn't Call Him a Socialist, Per Se -- But Same Difference?

It's very entertaining to observe the far left and far right and how they spend so much of their every day trying to toss labels and insults at the other side, while at the same time spending just as much time trying to defend against the same mindless little labels and insults foisted upon them by the opposite side. I just laugh. (And they think I'm the uneducated, ignorant and infirm one over here since I'm an Independent! -- but I digress).

In the history of this blog, as much as I have been so often critical of Obama and his world view and policies, I think there was only one time when I, in a fit of rage about something I'd heard that Obama wanted to advance, labeled the idea as "socialist". (I believe my blog headline was something like, "Goodbye America, Hello Socialism" (a take-off on the old song, "Goodbye My Darlin', Hello Vietnam," which runs over the opening credits of the movie "Full Metal Jacket")). And sure enough, the left (including my annoying little left friend Draconem -- that dude is always gettin' me mad!) crawled right out of the woodwork to decry such a moniker being placed at Obama's feet.

And for the record: I would not call Obama a "socialist," because I don't think his world view fits the letter of that term. That term commonly connotes a philosophy of the government taking over most all or all of the means and modes of production of a particular country and society. I wouldn't accuse Obama and all of his radical-leftist-progressive friends of wanting to go quite that far. But they damn sure want to "take advantage of a good crisis" (Obama right-hand-man Rahm Emanuel's words) in order to try to grow the scale of the federal government just as far and as big as they can ram-rod through the house and senate and right down our throats.

Anyone believing anything else is a fool. You know what really gets my goat about the far left and far right? They will always deny that which is obvious that they want to accomplish, such as that which I just stated above concerning the progressive agenda to increase the size of the federal government in our everyday lives just as big and huge as they can force it. Hey Radicals!: If any of you goofs would EVER, JUST FOR ONCE, ADMIT the truth concerning the goals that you seek to accomplish, I would actually give you freaks an ounce of respect for just being honest for a change! But that'll never happen (them being honest, that is)!

http://www.cnbc.com/id/35564308

Tuesday, February 23, 2010

Reconciliation: The Big Bluff?

You know, from a party full of politician leaders who are incessantly disingenuous and oftentimes just downright dishonest (not that they aren't just as many slimeballs in the repub party), I asked myself this question today: "Self, why do you typically distrust everything that this democrat party has to say, but yet you take it at face value when it comes to their threats, such as the nuclear option/reconciliation"? And the more I read and hear on the issue, I'm thinking reconciliation (i.e. the threat of ramming a massive health care bill through the Senate with only 51 votes) may well be little more than an idle threat.

I know, I know -- I've previously thought these radical-leftist-progressive-controlled dems would do anything necessary to ram through a huge health care bill, but I'm starting to think that the completely drastic measure of reconciliation is a "Bridge Too Far" that even the dems do not intend to try to cross. I think they may well be bluffing, with an aim towards bringing onboard a moderate republican or two (such that reconciliation would not be necessary) with minimal concessions to said moderate republican(s) in terms of the language of the bill.

I'm starting to think this for at least a couple of reasons: (1) Trying to ram this huge monstrosity through using reconciliation would be, based upon what I have read, a huge procedural nightmare based upon all the procedural roadblocks that repubs would be able to throw up; and (2) If Obama & The Dems have the unmitigated audacity to use such an obscure procedural mechanism (typically only used for budget-related matters) to ram through the most wide-sweeping legislation in 45 years against the clear will of The People (who overwelmingly oppose this legislation), it will be a disaster for the democrat party this fall of nearly Biblical proportions.

So my current money is on "BLUFF". That would also explain the leaks 4-6 weeks ago to the likes of Dick Morris (why would ANY DEM ever leak anything to him?) that reconciliation had been agreed upon by Obama/Pelosi/Reid as an option: Such leaks were probably calculated to have the reconciliation idea/threat out there for a number of weeks in order to give the Bluff more credibility down the road. Could I be completely off-base here? Absolutely. I'm just trying to guess the probabilities.

http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2010/02/23/politics/politicalhotsheet/entry6235624.shtml

Monday, February 22, 2010

Oh My! The Far Right Must Be SEETHING Tonight! Scott Brown to Vote FOR the Dems' New Stimulus/Jobs Bill!

As I said the night Brown captured the hearts of Massachusetts Independents and won senatorial election there Against All Odds, very little is still known about this dude -- We'll have to see how he acts in the years to come in the Senate. He's already committed to voting against Obama & The Dems' massive, unpopular health care bill. That's the correct side (as far as I'm concerned). Today he agrees, along with 5 or so other repub senators, to vote with the dems on this current New Stimulus/Jobs bill.

Off-hand opinion: I like the Independence he's exhibiting (and it's hilarious how Drudge has this as tonight's headline -- like I said, the right-wingers have to be Pi$$ed tonight!, and BTW, if you've read this space for even a week, you'll know that I love when either the right-wingers or the radical far left progressive-controlled dems are pi$$ed about anything -- It's hilarious, But I digress). So, I say "off-hand" opinion because frankly, I have not studied this New Stimulus/Jobs bill to any great degree, although it does seem to be very scaled-back legislation cost-wise and, completely unlike the massive First Obama Stimulus bill (which primarily was loaded with earmarks and pork for lawmakers in both parties), the current bill seems actually aimed at creating new jobs (BTW, why wasn't this the focus from Day 1 from Obama & The Dems? -- not that it's their focus even now, as they continue to focus on unpopular health care legislation).

Anyway, from what I have read, and like I said, it has not been intensive, I have not seen a credible basis to oppose this current New Stimulus/Jobs bill. If anything, repubs seem mainly to oppose it out of spite, since that slimeball Harry Reid unilaterally took off the table a prior version of this bill that certain repubs had invested some serious time in trying to negotiate. Nevertheless, spite should not be a reason for making substantive decisions as to whether to give a yea or neah on a piece of legislation. Bottom line: I do not have a credible basis to say this bill should be rejected and, based on that premise, Scott Brown appears again to be on the correct side of things here. Good start so far for him.

http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSN2221899520100222

Some Reassuring Words From an Unlikely Source.


As an Independent who does not like to see the country being driven towards either the far left or far right, and who is scared to death when either side/party has too much unfettered power in Washington, the past year has consisted of very Scary Days in my opinion. And even now, after the recent election results in Massachusetts, New Jersey and Virginia, Obama & the Dems seem as dead-set as ever to ram through their desired ultra-liberal pieces of massive federal legislation, such as the widely unpopular health care bill. To me, it's at times a feeling of almost complete helplessness watching this stuff going on in Washington. But today I noticed the closing sentences from an early-February column of conservative Charles Krauthammer. He may be a dyed in the wool conservative, but I think he realizes also that this has always been a centrist country. Such realization was exhibited in those closing words, which I found to provide just an ounce of reassurance during these dark times:

"No matter how far the ideological pendulum swings in the short term, in the end the bedrock common sense of the American people will prevail. The ankle-dwelling populace pushes back. It recenters. It renormalizes. Even in Massachusetts."

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/02/04/AR2010020403623.html

Sunday, February 21, 2010

U-S-A! U-S-A! The Americans Shock Canada Tonight 5-3 in Winter Olympics Ice Hockey.

Obviously, this is NOT an upset on quite the same level as 1980's Miracle on Ice, which might have been the biggest upset (actually, it was a couple of upsets) in the history of sport, at least not with the current American squad playing with a roster full of NHL players (as opposed to college kids playing against NHL-caliber players in 1980 from the Cold War era Soviet Union). But that being said, as the announcers noted tonight, the American team may consist of NHL guys, but "only a handful of them are recognizable NHL players." In contrast, Canada's team (also consisting entirely of NHL players) has been described as a veritable All-Star team of NHL guys. AND, tonight's game was played in Canada, which held a huge home ice advantage in this one. Bottom line: Canada was heavily favored here, the US has not beaten Canada in Olympic hockey EVER to my knowledge (or least not in many, many decades), and this was a HUGE upset. I only caught the third period, and it was extremely exciting. Great win. But this is only the preliminary round. Plenty of hockey left to play.

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2010/olympics/2010/02/21/usa.canada.blog/index.html?eref=sihp