Doublespeak for the Dimwitted: Obama Brags About Ending Iraq War, Then Sends EVEN MORE Troops There!

The lyin' leftist really does have absolutely no shame. After recently boasting again that he's responsible for ending the war in Iraq, Obama announced Thursday that he's sending 450 more boots on the ground (errr, "advisors") to the desert nation...

This latest increase brings things to a total of 3,550 American troops on the ground in Iraq sent there by Obama. And the immoral dirtballs of the leftist 20 percenter democrat party and deranged right-winger gop-er party barely bat an eye.

The leftists couldn't give a shit because Hypocrisy is their M.O.: Raise hell in the streets about foreign military involvement, but only if the current president has an "R" next to his name. If it's instead a "D", then circle the wagons and either remain silent or defend the dolt democrat no matter what he/she orders.  Such Guts and Conviction!  Douchebags.

The right-winger slugs ain't gonna say much either, because most of them embrace (or are at least highly sympathetic to) the view that it's America's job to kill bad guys, topple evil regimes, and otherwise police the world -- no matter how many young American men and women have to die for very little reason in the process...

That's classic W Bush/Cheney neo-con thought, which even Obama over the years has been shown to accept to a degree, and it's horseshit. The U.S. government has no business ever getting our military involved in foreign wars or incursions unless it's absolutely necessary -- which is almost never the case.

The last time a democrat party president gradually built up an army of military "advisors" in a foreign land, we got the disastrous Vietnam War campaign of the 60s and 70s -- a terrible era that left lasting scars upon the soul of the nation that never seem to heal almost 50 years later.

Today, the demonic "islamic state" poses plenty of threats to us at our borders and within our country, but poses no threat to us in Iraq and Syria. Obama should get our 3,550 troops the hell out of there. Yesterday.

http://www.nationaljournal.com/white-house/white-house-on-american-deployment-to-iraq-for-now-450-troops-are-what-is-necessary-20150610

Poll: "8 in 10 Back Voter ID Laws" -- Leaving a Loony Little Fringe of 2 in 10 (Including Hilary & His Majesty) Who Would Let Just About Anyone Show Up and Vote...

But hey, several years back I didn't coin the phrase "leftist 20 percenters" for the base of the democrat party for nuttin' over here!

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/poll-8-in-10-back-voter-id/article/2565542

The Idiot Outpolls the Jackass: CNN Poll This Week Shows That For First Time Ever, W Bush Polls More Popular than His Majesty...

In what's being called "the first time in more than a decade that Americans have expressed a favorable view of Bush," the CNN poll reported that 52% of Americans view Bush favorably, while only 49% view favorably the individual we currently have for a president ("the individual").

But I call it something different entirely:  As in, keep this 52% and this 49% the fuck away from me and mine.  Because they live in the blissful ignorance of a Joe Pantoliano Matrix dream, and that's no place that I ever wanna be.

It's simple stuff: Idiot Bush and the individual are the two worst and most destructive presidents of my lifetime, and I've lived through freakin' Jimmy Carter.  And they're two of the very worst presidents in American history.

If you're one of the fools that views either of these two louts favorably, then shame on you. And open your freakin' eyes for once in your life. The view might not be so great, but at least for the first time ever you'll be something other than just what the leftists and right-wingers want you to be.

http://www.politico.com/story/2015/06/poll-george-w-bush-popularity-obama-popularity-118576.html?hp=r4_4

Drop Your Cocks & Grab Your Socks: Hilary's Scheduled to Visit Missouri In Person in June! WOOT, WOOT!!!

No word yet whether Hilary will be uttering any words or other sundry audible noises during the visit (other than to herself).

But what difference, at this point, does it make?

Point is, Hilary will be gracing us with her petrified presence from the past.

So give praise.

And all glory and honor.

She's entitled.

Inevitable.

So make way.  (To the back of the line, that is).

She's Hilary the Hoary, not sugar honey ice tea, damn you.

http://kansascity.suntimes.com/kc-politics-government/7/112/266174/hillary-clinton-missouri-visit

She Ain't Heavy, She's a Hottie: Ballerina Broad Fired from Ballet for Being "Too Fat" Can Feel Free to Turn Pirouettes on Me All. Night. Long!

What do ya have to be, some kind a midget or something, like one of them little horse jockeys, to dance in the god damn ballet? Jesus.

But her misfortune hasn't stopped this Anastasia Volochkova. She appears to have quite the online following, and in the past week took to the Net to show everyone her hot babe bona fides in front of the Indian Ocean. And just take a look at that shit above. Good Grief!

BTW, is one technically "buck naked" if mostly covered with sand? Or does that merely make you "partially nude"? And what if your ass is bare, but partially obscured by virtue of water submergence? Leave me the fuck alone a few minutes so that I may consult my pay-per-view porn channel in my never-ending quest for answers.

http://www.cosmopolitan.com/entertainment/news/a40901/fat-shamed-ballerina-posts-nude-pics-to-shut-down-haters/
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3093036/Bolshoi-ballerina-fired-FAT-shows-incredible-body-risque-poses-holiday-snaps-shared-fans.html

Non-Exceptional: Obama's UN Ambassador, Samantha Power, Says Afghanistan Is Better for Women than the USA! But Methinks this Broad Gots a Point...

...I mean, look no farther than the highest levels of American power to prove this skirt's premise...

For years now we've heard how Obama's White House has refused to adopt the same "equal pay" principles that Obama has often spouted, consistently paying female staffers less than their male counterparts.

Then recently we heard that Hilary Clinton embraced the same sexist tendencies on her 2008 presidential campaign, compensating the boys better than the girls.

Since the issue remains relevant, it looks we're going to need someone to gin up the ol' War on Women again in the 2016 presidential candidate debates. Where the fuck's George Stephanopoulos when we really need him?

http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2015/05/samantha-power-doubles-down-on-emma-sulkowiczs-bogus-rape-claim.php
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/samantha-power/my-barnard-college-commen_b_7304670.html

Damn My Double Vision! "Make-Up Free Zoe Saldana Wears Skintight Leggings as She Works Up a Sweat at the Gym in Hollywood" -- Or So Someone Seems to be Observing, Leastways...

Frankly, who the fuck's lookin' at the make up, face, or leggings?!?

This broad's gotta perky little near-perfectamundo rack for which I'd gladly trade 1000 Alabama shithouses, even given the goin' rate on scrap iron and lumber.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-3032932/Zoe-Saldana-wears-skintight-leggings-works-sweat-gym-Hollywood.html

Thank You, King Joffrey: Obama Ordains From On High in Recent Days that "We're Going to Have to Change How the Media Reports." And Frankly, I Couldn't Agree More...

To wit: All the fawning. The hero worship. The ass-kissing. The zealous advocacy. The free ride. The choreographed questions. The blissful ignoring. The cute, cuddly curtsies...

For seven long years, Obama's enjoyed all the benefits and advantages of a national media much more concerned with taking Obama's side and protecting him than actually, you know, letting some journalism break out or something.

So like the proverbial broken watch is nearly always correct twice a day, Obama has me agreeing with him over here: We're going to have to change how this damn media reports (just like we need to change people's religious beliefs, as Hilary astutely observed recently). After all, this whole freedom of press, speech, and religion thing is getting WAY overrated nowadays, don't 'cha agree?

http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2015/05/barack-obama-media-critic.php

"GOD I WANT YOU RIGHT NOW": Missouri gop-er House Speaker & Aspiring Lyricist John Diehl Resigns Over "Sexually Charged Exchanges" with Joplin College Freshman Intern Broad!

Reading these texts (link at bottom), I was just waiting for this 49-year-old Diehl to purport to break into song or something, like a poor fat white man's Marvin Gaye. Hell, he's already got some smooth lyrics in the can:

- "Once I start I don't stop"

- "Will have my way with you"

- "And leave you quivering"

- "You will be in good hands"

- "God I want you right now"

- "Laying in bed looking at your pic"

- "I was thinking ab[o]ut what you said you wear to bed"

- "I am soooo distracted right now . . ."

- ". . . You would be in trouble if you were here."

But fledgling Motown career aside, really the only unresolved question in my mind is this:

Did this John Diehl leave things at inappropriate texting, or did his John Thomas make an appearance at some juncture, a la Diehl's democrat party versions, Bill Clinton and Anthony's Weiner?

Which itself hatches an idea for what could be the next big thing in popular music: I'm thinking of a new supergroup with Diehl on lead vocals, Clinton gettin' a saxophone puff, and Weiner flouting his flute. Just call 'em the Kumstain Trio.

http://www.kansascity.com/news/government-politics/article20822424.html
More Sexual Healing: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rjlSiASsUIs

Postscript:  Another great post suggest by Not Yo' Baby Mama!  Thank You, Not Mama!

This Broad Can Reyna My Parade Any Day: "Time Lapse Video Charts the Evolution of Mexican Beauty Over the Last 100 Years." And I Know the Decade I'm Hittin'!

The ongoing "100 Years of Beauty" series from Cut.com is now featuring hot little number Reyna Marquez dolled up just like they did it in various decades past. And after considering all of this model Reyna's various looks from the past and present, it ain't an easy decision (just how gorgeous is that 1910 Clay Basket look from Centennial?), but I've made one...

That's right, I'll take a piece of 1980s Reyna! Good Grief, does that dish look healthy and ready to go! And she ain't the only one. So excuse me now while I go hit the shitter. Megots some deep thoughts to collect.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/04/29/100-years-of-beauty-mexico_n_7170658.html
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-3061679/From-sombreros-soft-waves-new-time-lapse-video-charts-evolution-Mexican-beauty-100-years.html

Politically Incorrect: Hilary Clinton, Opposed to Gay Marriage Until Only Very Recently, Also Previously Spouted that "I Am Adamantly Against Illegal Immigrants"!

Jeezal Peezal. With angry racist homophobes like Hilary running around, who needs gop-ers?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VxASD4jHgCk&feature=youtu.be

AP Poll: "Decisive Majority of Americans View [Hilary] Clinton as Dishonest," Including More Than 60% of Independents. But How Can that Possibly Be?

Ans: While admittedly politically ignorant to the hilt, the American people are not, overall, outright stupid -- even if leftist 20 percenters believe the precise opposite.

And please spare me, Hilary, the usual attacks on the source and messenger. This is the Associated Press -- not exactly a bastion of right-winger propaganda over there.

http://tbo.com/ap/poll-doubts-about-clintons-honesty-after-emails-20150501/

Supreme Dork: At Gay Marriage Arguments this Week, Right-Winger Justice Alito Asks If 2 Dudes & 2 Ladies Are Entitled to a Foursome Marriage Under the Constitution. Obvious Answer: Depends...

Depends on a lot. Like after matrimony, would the two broads be hookin' up directly?

On videotape?

Would they let each guy do a threesome with the two of 'em?

Is one or both of these tootses screamers?

What are their views on leg and hand restraints?

Hows about yafflin' the ol' yogurt cannon?

Are we talkin' terrific tits, or lumbering lard vats?

Asses that shake like a salt shaker, or an old barrel hoop?

In sum, how the fuck can I say whether two dudes should be allowed to marry a couple 'a broads if I know absolutely nothing about said skirts?

Alito oughta go back to law school or something. After his half-baked hypothetical, he strikes me as a couple pubes short of a Clarence Thomas.

http://www.nytimes.com/live/supreme-court-same-sex-marriage-arguments/conservative-justices-raise-questions-about-polygamy/

BRRR: 30 Degree Temps Hit NYC Over Weekend & New Report Declares "Global Warming Has Slowed" to "Natural Variability." But Isn't All That Beside the Point?

Maybe I'm a little fucked up, a little confused. I thought temps meant little to the issue of "Global Warming"? In fact, "Global Warming" ain't even the correct term for you to use anymore, you Climate Denier Bastards, ya...

To wit: Coldest decade in history? Climate Change. Hottest decade in history? Climate Change. No aqua in Cali? Climate Change. Earthquake kills 1000+ in Nepal? Climate Change. National debt tops $17 Trillion? Climate Change. Gunman goes on rampage? Climate Change. (Oh wait, I meant to say Gun Control on that one. Gettin' my canned, rotgut, groupthink blame reactions mixed up over here. But I digress...)

Isn't the real point this: The temps, the facts, the trends, and the realities matter little in any of this? Because regardless of any of those variables -- indeed, regardless, of what occurs -- the leftist 20 percenters are going to beat the "climate change" drum and try to silence any dissent or discussion to the contrary?

Because the issue, closely akin to a form of religion, is that important to them -- as a means to an end, that is. The endgame is "climate change" legislation and massive expansions in the size and power of the federal government bureaucracy as a result. (Recall the Cap'n Trade monstrosity they foisted through the House in 2009 (only to have it later die in the Senate)). The ends always justify the means with leftists, and "climate change" is just the means, the pretense, to even bigger government despite our stifling national debt.

Remember this the next time you may feel tempted to get in the middle of the "climate change" sniping between the leftist 20 percenters and the right-wingers. You'd be wasting valuable time out of your life. Because the facts and the truth simply matter not.

http://www.nj.com/yankees/index.ssf/2015/04/how_cold_will_it_be_for_yankees-mets_subway_series.html
http://patch.com/new-jersey/wayne/weather-alert-record-level-cold-hazardous-weather-freeze-watch-new-jersey-0
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-3052926/Our-climate-models-WRONG-Global-warming-slowed-recent-changes-natural-variability-says-study.html

Old Bat Meet Kettle: Hilary, With an Estimated Net Worth of $150-200 MILLION, Calls This Week for Those Dastardly Wealthy People to be "Toppled" to the Ground!

Hackneyed Hilary is well-positioned to be 2016's version of forgettable gop-er Mitt Romney -- an out-of-touch, ultra-rich political fat cat who doesn't stand for much of anything except all-encompassing ego and perceived entitlement to elected office.

I mean, the way this broad's going, she's going to be worth more than the ol' Mittster by Election Day 2016 (and that fart's worth a cool quarter-BILLION dollars)! (Especially if some of those Middle Eastern dictators really start buckin' up on Hilary's behalf!).

Meantime Hilary's deep old pappy pockets -- she's threatened to spend a mind-boggling record $2.6 BILLION on the 2016 campaign -- certainly hasn't stopped her from spouting the same tired, hundred years' old, class warfare rhetoric of the leftist democrat party.  She declared this week that she will "topple" (common meaning: tear down; bring to a ruinous end) those damn pesky rich people (apparently excluding her own rich ancient carcass).  But hey, I guess really old rhetoric sort of befits really old candidates, no?

Besides, you've heard, haven't ya? That's right -- Hilary The Hoary says she wants to be your "Champion"!  Whatever that means, precisely...

But truth be told, if being a "Champion" means sleep-walking through a vapid, out of the past, Astroturf presidential campaign chock full of adolescent talking points, inevitability, and entitled arrogance, then the fossilized former first lady must certainly be considered at least a #1 Contender. Maybe Hilary should be the one stepping into the ring with Wladimir Klitschko this weekend instead of Bryant Jennings?

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/04/21/hillary-clinton-calls-for_0_n_7108026.html

"World's Biggest House Goes Up For Sale -- 115 Bedrooms, 100 Bathrooms"! Man, I Could Use That Kinda Space to Move Around In...

Rager is sick and tired of being confined in small spaces, and this joint in Italy could really hit the spot.  But what to do with all them damn rooms?!?

Oh, I'd put 'em to use, just you never mind about that.  To wit:

-"Shithouse of the Day":  First, I'd rotate my use of all 100 shitters, such that no particular privy would need to be used anymore than 3 or 4 days out of the year. Special added benefit: With such infrequent use, I could probably get by (at least most of the time) with not having the crappers cleaned more than once every 10-20 years or so.

-"The Porn Nook":  I've long had a hankerin' to set aside an exclusive preview room for my Friday night porn pictures. Now I'd have it! With a year's supply of wash towels on hand at all times.

-"A Multi-Pantried Approach":  I'd devote a different room to become the pantry for each of the five food groups. Ya know -- red meat, bread, condiments, soup, and beer.

-"Give the Broads the Ol' Four Corners":  That joint's so huge, one could have four broads over at the same time, and just squirrel each away in a different corner!  "Be back in a little while, Mary Lou -- I gots a room to hit over there to check out for leaky pipes."

-"The Centrifuge":  This would be a dungeon-like chamber of horrors where I'd toss any leftists or right-wingers dumb enough to ever come a' trespassing or poachin' on my land.

-"The Bada-Bing Room": This space would double as not only a "Sopranos" viewing room on weekend mornings, but would also be easily convertible to a fully equipped titty bar to entertain any of my friends who aren't dead yet when they're in town.

-"Weapons Cache": Last but not least, meneeds a central repository for the utensils necessary to keep Centrifuge inhabitants and other motherfuckers in line when they're around my joint. Here, I'd have on hand the standard panoply of devices of mayhem, from buggy whips, riding crops, and railroad spikes, to meat grinders, Katana swords, and bone-saws.

So my plan's well on its way. Now I just need the $30 million for the askin' price. That's a shitload of bank jobs and/or gas stations to knock over. Not that I'm even given to that sort of thing, but I gots to try sumpin over here to pursue me Dream, No?

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/property/11467864/Its-the-worlds-biggest-house-for-sale-and-its-top-secret.html

Hey, Lots of Really Old People Don't In Fact Have Dementia: UK Newspaper Cover Actually Seems to Imply that Hilary Has Alzeimer's!

That's a front page from UK's The Independent this week. And I don't care too much for the insinuation either...

Sure, Hilary's a decrepit old war horse out of the past. Sure, she's a lying sack of entitled excrement to boot. But someone needs to tell The Independent that there's a difference between (1) a person who goes around knowingly spouting fraudulent statements about past events and (2) a person who simply misremembers the past after losing their marbles to Alzeimer's.

I just haven't seen any credible evidence that Hilary currently has on-set Alzeimer's symptoms, a la right-winger hero Ronald Reagan in his second term.  Hilary may be pushing 70, but she ain't quite arrived at ol' Ronnie's mid-1980s age just yet.  Give her to around 2018, however, and let's reconvene on the issue.  Deal?

http://www.scoopnest.com/user/suttonnick/588100385912528900

Can't Say I Blame Her: Female Rapper Azealia Banks "Talks Obama Sex Fantasy in Billboard Magazine"...

Ya know, I've certainly been known to poke fun at the first lady's overbearing food police penchant from time to time. But I've never said she's unattractive...

In fact, I believe I've noted previously in this space that she's truly quite fetching for an early 50s-something broad. Best lookin' first lady of my lifetime (even if the pickens have been mighty slim).

So I can definitely see where this Azealia Banks is coming from when she talks about her Obama sex fantasy. Only one caveat: If this hot little item Azealia next conjures up a Hilary fantasy, then methinks you'll hear the Rager whistlin' a much different tune the next time around.

http://www.billboard.com/articles/news/6523927/billboard-cover-sneak-peek-azealia-banks?mobile_redirection=false

"What's in a Name?" Female Supporters Warn, "Don't Call 'Hillary' Clinton By Her First Name [Nor Sundry Other Garden-Variety Terms] -- That's Sexist!" OK, I Shall Abide [To a Point]...

Shit, I already been abidin' for a year or two now. I never say "Hillary"...

Rather it'll always be "Hilary" to me. You see, I don't ever call political slimeballs by the names, labels, or spellings they're given, request, or prefer to be called. They're deserving of no such respect.

That leads me to "democrat party." And "gop-er party." And
"leftist [20 percenters]". And "right-wingers." And "Hilary," as the case may be.

Not to mention other descriptions that Hilary supporters have recently warned me not to use (and by those warnings I cannot abide), to wit:  Hilary Clinton is a polarizing, calculating, disingenuous, insincere, ambitious, inevitable, entitled, over-confident, secretive, out of touch, do anything to win, old battle axe of a broad who represents the past (and every single word of that be true).  Now, all that being said...

S-O-O-O-O-O -- What should you call ME, you may be inquiring?

ANS:  Just keep your fuckin' mouth shut about me.

http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2015/04/07/262261/whats-in-a-name-hillary-by-any.html
http://www.examiner.com/article/clinton-supporters-threaten-reporter-lists-forbidden-words-hillary-coverage

The Inside Skinny: How Victoria's Secret Model Kelly Gale Manages to Go Around Looking Like THIS...

According to this hot little Australian number Kelly, her secret is a simple two-fold equation:  (1) Hit the gym 3 times a day; and (2) Consume a bunch of seeds and berries and shit (pic above).

My only question:  Is this broad claiming that I can get down to Kelly-like male proportions if I just maintain a diet focused on such things as barley, wheat, oats, and rye seeds? 

Because, I've gots a good friend named Mr. K-Ice who packs all them same damn seeds, but very much begs to differ with Kelly's proffered opinion.

http://www.vogue.com/8207091/victorias-secret-model-kelly-gale-body-workout-playlist/
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-3010981/Victoria-s-Secret-model-Kelly-Gale-shows-enviable-body-reveals-hits-gym-THREE-times-day.html

Report: "Michelle O 'Healthy' Lunches Fed to Pigs." OK, This Whole Michelle ObamaMeals Thing Is Really Starting to Get a Bit Ridiculous...

Where are the animal rights people when you need them for once? This is so inhumane...

Here we have a clear abuse of innocent hogs, and PETA's not so much as even stickin' a snout in.

Meantime the ASPCA also needs to grow a hoof, apparently thinking that feeding crap to swine be fine as well.

Meguesses these Michelle ObamaMeals must have the right letter next to their name.

http://eagnews.org/michelle-os-healthy-lunches-going-to-the-pigs-literally/