Slimeball Christmas: Obama/GOP Tax Bill Loaded With Earmarks & Sweetheart Tax Gifts For Such Things as Hollywood, Railroad Tracks, Race Horses & Rum.

For many Americans, it seemed like a simple enough and easy-to-support tax compromise between Obama, the democrat party and republicans: The current income tax rates would be extended for all Americans for two additional years rather than having those rates go up during the ongoing recession. Apart from the far left loons, who could possibly be against that, right?

Problem is, the "tax bill" (signed this week by Obama) was also chock full of earmarks and specialized tax breaks of all sorts -- all completely unrelated to the issue of the income tax rate. And democrats and republicans alike jumped onboard faster than you can say Porky Pig. Business as usual in DC. (There was just an election a few months back, no?)

And that's the reason why I was opposed to the bill before it was passed. But even I didn't realize the full magnitude of some of the utter crap that these two parties jammed into the bill. A lot of that is just starting to come to light now. As the linked story details, the "tax bill" contains all kinds of horse$hit having nothing whatsoever to do with income tax rates. Here's some examples:

-Tax breaks for producing movies and TV shows in Hollywood.
-Rum subsidies for Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands.
-Grants to put up windmills.
-Grants for producing solar energy.
-Tax breaks for people to buy race horses.
-Tax breaks related to railroad track maintenance.
-Other breaks for motorsport racetrack upgrades.

And if you're like me and most Americans -- i.e. not really involved in a great deal of movie production, race horse ownership or windmill construction -- then Obama and these two parties have a special gift in this new bill that may just apply to you: For homeowners, an end to the tax break for paying local property taxes unless you pay a tax preparer to itemize your deductions on your tax return. The linked story says that two-thirds of tax filers don't itemize.

Put another way: The new bill sticks it to millions of average Americans who don't itemize by taking away one of their most basic tax breaks while at the same time including within the bill all sorts of sweetheart tax breaks for huge companies, Hollywood movie studios and players within the race horse industry.

Gee, thanks Obama, democrats and republicans (and Captain Morgan thanks you as well)! Just in time for Christmas too! With such wonderful politicians as all of you looking out for us this Christmas season, who needs the Grinch?

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/us_tax_cuts_goodies

Making Jimmy "Superfly" Snuka and "Original Gangsta" New Jack Proud: Romanian Fool Leaps From Parliament Balcony to Protest Public Worker Wage Cuts!

His name is Adrian Sobaru -- nickname Sabu. He doesn't much care for the fact that the Romanian government, "mired in recession," recently cut wages for public employees. And damn it, he was going to do something about it! What, you might ask? Well, jump off a 23-foot-high Parliament balcony, of course! What else was he to do?

The linked story explains that Sabu first "clambered up on to the balcony" as the Romanian Prime Minister was getting ready to kick off a parliamentary session. Sabu wore a white T-shirt that proclaimed, among other things, "You've Pierced Us!" After a little window dressing consisting of some wild gestures and shouting, Sabu got down (literally) to the main event: Sabu took a flying leap off the balcony, apparently barely missing some of the lawmakers below as he crashed into the hard floor.

While this goof could have used to have had some sense knocked into him as a result of his little header, he reportedly suffered only minor injuries. What's more, his mouth was left completely intact. As they hauled his ass out on a stretcher, Sabu shouted "Freedom!" at the horrified onlookers. No word yet whether he'll now face criminal charges, although he will be forced, for some reason, to undergo "psychological counseling."

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1341112/Horror-Romanian-man-leaps-Parliament-balcony-protest-austerity-measures.html#

Creature of the House Nancy Pelosi Turns to Hollywood to Help "Rebrand" the Image of Herself & the Democrat Party.

Sorry, San Fran Nan, but that's sort of like trying to "rebrand" a floater in a Mississippi $hithouse. And I love how Steven Spielberg comes out with an immediate statement denying the Washington Post report. Good company you're keeping there, Stevie: Helping out the out-of-touch likes of Creature Pelosi and then denying a WaPo report with your best impression of Tricky Dick Nixon. Maybe next you can have Liddy hold his hand over a flame for a few minutes to scare us?

http://voices.washingtonpost.com/thefix/democratic-party/steven-spielberg-advising-nanc.html

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/2010/12/23/2010-12-23_steven_spielberg_not_advising_house_speaker_nancy_pelosi_democrats_on_rebranding.html

Obama Signs "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" Repeal for Gays in the Military. After Much Reflection, Here's My Thought...

...Yawn.

Obama the great gay rights advocate who's on record opposing gay marriage. So let me get this straight: They're equal enough to kill, but not to marry? (Apologies to Barry McGuire). Hypocrite.

And on the subject of the troops, we now near the end of a year 2010 that has seen almost 500 American troops killed in that absolute hellhole they call Afghanistan -- easily the most deadly year yet among many deadly years in the now 10-year-long war. Maybe the media can next declare that an "Obama victory" too?

http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/12/22/dadt.repeal/index.html
http://icasualties.org/oef/

The Senate's Poised to Ratify Obama's "START" Treaty with Russia: More Lameduck Arrogance from the Democrat Party As Well As Republicans.

It's called the "START" nuclear arms treaty with Russia -- a deal negotiated by Obama and his minions, who are now about to jam it through the Senate during the lameduck session with most of the American population focusing their entire attention on their Christmas shopping. And more than a fourth of Senate republicans are onboard to help out. Chickenshit stuff.

Never before in American history has the Senate ratified a treaty during a lameduck session of Congress. Why have such an important matter decided by a bunch of people whom the American population has just voted out? Why isn't the most prudent and respectful course of action to wait until January, when this treaty -- which is not a simple one to digest or fully understand in terms of its risks, dangers and potential benefits -- can be fully debated and vetted by the body of lawmakers that America just voted in?

Hell, if at this point you go around spouting opinions that this treaty is either a great evil OR the greatest thing since sliced bread, then I have little respect for you as being much of anything other than a partisan hack. The fact is, we the public have not been privy to even a fraction of the information that these senators have received about the treaty and any side assurances (or threats) from the Russians that accompanied the treaty. Instead, that's all been fed to senators in secret hearings with Hillary Clinton and secret conversations with the Obama administration.

This is slimeball stuff, folks -- just what we've grown to always expect from the politicians in these two awful parties. They should be waiting until next year, but they refuse. They refuse to wait to allow the people we voted in to decide whether to ratify, and they refuse to wait until a point in time when the American public will be better informed and more focused on the issue.

That's because these sleazewad politicians on both sides of the aisle have little respect for the American people. And that's why we Independents (who control all election outcomes) will continue to vote these scumjob politicians' asses to the curb over and over again as we reach each successive election cycle. Ratify that.

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1210/46669.html

"If You Gotta Go, You Gotta Go":Pennsylvania Woman Allegedly Gets Really Pissed, Then Urinates All Over the Treats in a Convenience Store Freezer!

"If you gotta go, you gotta go" -- the famous last words of Sterling Hayden's corrupt police captain in The Godfather, uttered right before Melancholy Don Michael Corleone (Al Pacino) excused himself to the $hithouse at Louis' restaurant in the Bronx. To quote brother Sonny Corleone, Michael moments later came out of that bathroom "holding more than just his [junk]" and it was Bada Bing Bada Boom!:

Mikey whacked out the good captain (as well as Sollozzo the drug dealer) and officially put a real damper on the veal pasta dinner ("the best in the City") the threesome had been enjoying. In an instance of life (loosely) imitating art, urination was allegedly once again a source of culinary ruin one state over in Pennsylvania this week:

23-year-old Carrie Harkness (pictured above) was in her neighborhood Country Fair convenience store in Meadville, Pennsylvania, when employees asked her to leave. This enraged the young lady, who allegedly then provided employees with a whole new meaning for the phrase "pissed off." Harkness allegedly got her wee-wee on right there in the store inside a food freezer. But that reportedly wasn't the worst part.

As the linked story asks, "What kind of a person allegedly urinates in a convenience store freezer, ruining $508 worth of cookies, bagels, and other baked goods?" So let me get this straight: It wasn't just the act of wetting down the freezer -- nope, she had to go and ruin some perfectly good baked treats in the process!

And if this had merely been a freezer full of some bland ol' milk, cottage cheese and eggs, would this story be getting so much run and would Harkness be facing charges of criminal mischief and disorderly conduct? (No word yet whether Harkness will be advancing an "if you gotta go, you gotta go" defense to those charges).

Regardless, this story begs the question of why Harkness was asked to leave the store in the first place? There are precious few details on that question (never use the phrase "details are sketchy," BTW, because it's not a detail if it's "sketchy"). The only clues come from a largely nonsensical Facebook posting from Harkness, who said:

"Omg have you ever liked someone so much and go out with them and make a fool of yourself????? wish I could take back friday night!!!!! But youngstown is on point wish my friend could forgive me!!!!!!"

The only thing I can make out of that posting is that perhaps some dude worked at the convenience store and a smitten Harkness was there to see him. However, that's purely conjecture on my part (?????). But whatever Harkness was trying to say in that post, I have little doubt that she was very serious about it!!!!!! And Youngstown is right on point, damn it!!!!!

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/buster/pennsylvania/woman-chaurged-urinating-grocery-store-freezer-ruining-508-food

You Can Say "Holiday Party" If You Please, But I'll Keep Saying "Christmas Party," Thank You...

...This weekend National Public Radio leftist-in-residence Nina Totenberg (whose main claim to fame was for her portrayal of Jerry's mother on the old Seinfeld TV series) actually apologized in advance for using the phrase "Christmas party" on a PBS program ("Forgive the expression," crowed the old battle axe) (link to story at bottom).

You know, I'm kind of funny like this: The more you try to impose upon me your view of what constitutes politically incorrect language, the more I'm going to intentionally go out of my way to use that very language -- over and over and over again. Put another way, Mrs. Seinfeld: Christmas party; Christmas party; Christmas party.

And if you have a problem with that, then you and Mrs. Seinfeld, along with a gaggle of midgets, stewardesses and manhole covers, can go down to the funeral parlor shithouse and tell it to the undertaker or something. Meantime I'll be heading to the Christmas parties (with no apologies necessary) and having fun, as usual. Stick that in your left-wing peace pipe and smoke it.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2010/12/20/nprs_nina_totenberg_apologizes_for_saying_christmas.html

You Want "S'More" of Me, First Lady? Sarah Palin Takes Another Potshot at Michelle Obama.

Sarah Palin doesn't much care for Michelle Obama's "fight against childhood obesity." First Palin thumbed her nose in the First Lady's face by bringing cookies to a Pennsylvania high school, and now she's even using her reality show (Sarah Palin's Alaska) to get in on the act. On last night's episode, Palin was trying to whip up some "s'mores" for her family when she got off the following blast: "Where are the s'mores ingredients? This is in honor of Michelle Obama, who said the other day we should not have dessert."

Palin sure has a way of rubbing other females the wrong way and being so rubbed herself. Just recently, it's been Kate Gosselin and Elisabeth Hasselbeck, and now it's apparently the First Lady. My previous suggestion in each instance was that Palin have a Cat Fight with the other lady, but in the case of Sarah/Michelle, I'm instead going to suggest a Food Fight, perhaps held inside an UFC-style Octagon cage. There comes a time when two ladies just need to settle their differences once and for all.

But that aside, I really have little problem with the substance of Michelle Obama's informational message. It's not necessarily any good for you to have dessert with every single lunch or dinner, and it's doubtless the case that American kids could generally eat healthier. Plus, First Ladies always have to have their little causes that they like to go out and talk about. I get that. Fine.

Where I have issue is with Obama's efforts to increase federal government regulation in this area, such as by having the government fully regulate local school lunches. Unnecessary, overbearing, and far leftist -- the sort of things that don't play too well with most of us here in middle America, sorry. Talk and preach all you want about our diets. But keep your federal government mitts out of our local schools and stop trying to coerce what kids eat through excessive federal regulation and the allowance out-of-control lawsuits.

And for the record: I don't much care for "s'mores" myself. Never have. Not a big dessert guy. Not a marshmellow guy. Palin can keep 'em as far as I'm concerned. Or maybe she can offer some to Michelle personally if the promoters are ever able to put together the aforementioned Food Fight-to-End-It-All Cage Match.

http://blogs.abcnews.com/thenote/2010/12/when-does-pailins-reality-become-palins-politics-sarah-palin-zings-michelle-obama-over-dessert.html

"We Seen the Deer Going Under!" Maryland Men Rescue Deer From Icy Water, Get Slapped with Tickets For Their Efforts.

Apart from bad grammar, I'm not sure what offense was committed by Jim Hart and Khalil Abusakran. The two men worked with others late this week to rescue a deer from the rigid water of Maryland's Patapsco River (pictured left). Said Abusakran: "We seen the deer going under. It couldn’t maintain. It was starting to freeze, and it was really getting bad." So they pulled the creature out of the water. And that's when Mr. Cop, sitting on the sidelines, reared his ugly head.

Copper actually had the gall to write the two men tickets for being in the water without life jackets! $90 fine for each man! Can you say ticket quota? How about dumbass? How about the pawn shop security guard from Pulp Fiction? Same difference.

And the funny thing is, the two men say that the cop just sat there and watched them going in and out of the water without ever saying a word (or apparently lifting a finger to help)! "He didn’t stop us at all," said Hart. But why would the cop stop them? After all, if he had done that, he wouldn't have been able to write them tickets.

Finally, the real kicker: The two men claim they didn't break any law at all, since reportedly life jackets are only required in Maryland waterways if you're a kid or a teenager (which neither man is). But why ever let a pesky little thing like the law get in the away of writing some good tickets, right!? They say crime doesn't pay, and too often being a good samaritan is little different.

http://baltimore.cbslocal.com/2010/12/17/good-samaritans-face-fine-after-rescuing-deer-from-icy-water/

Would Republicans Really Ever Nominate Sarah Palin for President? New Poll Finds 6 in 10 Americans Would Not Even Consider Voting for Her in 2012.

With negative numbers like that, who needs Kate Gosselin? I've said before that Sarah Palin would have zero chance against Obama in the general election because of her high negatives, and the new ABC News/Washington post poll certainly supports that (first link at bottom). I just can't believe that republicans would ever consider nominating her, but yet she continues to be discussed as being as viable of a candidate for 2012 as anyone in the republican field.

For the record, count me among the 60% of Americans who wouldn't consider voting for Palin. And it's really nothing personal -- I just don't think she has the mentality necessary to be president (leaving alone the fact that I'm not a right-winger). Even though one of my prior blog posts is cited as the "Ronald Reagan" entry on TinaDupuy.com's Sarah Palin's Enemies List (where I had fun with Palin using "Bozo" instead "Bonzo" in the title of the old Reagan movie) (second and third links below), I am most certainly not a Palin hater.

I've often said that in addition to being hot, I also very much respect how she's been able to turn her 5 minutes of fame in 2008 into a fortune and a bona fide celebrity status. More power to her! But I just don't think she has what it takes to be president, sorry. And given some of those new poll numbers, apparently I'm not alone in that sentiment.

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2010/12/17/poll-six-in-ten-say-they-wont-consider-palin/
http://www.tinadupuy.com/uncategorized/sarahpalinsenemylist/
http://independentrage.blogspot.com/2010/11/bedtime-for-bozo-sarah-palin-takes-dump.html

Grannies Nationwide Apparently Nix Geritol & Are Instead Poppin' Roids: The Latest Has Gopher State Granny Allegedly Knocking Over a Bank!

Earlier this week we had the Granny in Kansas (first link below) pounding an attacker into unconsciousness with a frying pan ("I beat him down," she said), and today we have a story from Minnesota about a 70-year-old Granny who allegedly robbed a bank after first duping a 26-year-old man to act as her getaway driver (second link below)! (No word yet whether Granny also had an unwitting "second story man" on the payroll for the heist).

The man (Luke Even Weimert) says he thought he was just doing a "good deed" for Granny (Sandra Leaann Bathke) by taking her in his Jaguar down to the bank so that she could pull some money out to pay her rent. Bank employees say Granny entered the joint, claimed to be packin' more heat than a Granny Clampett, and told them to cough up the dough.

Then Granny allegedly hit the pavement $3700 richer. She jumped in the Jag, and Luke Even Weimert even tried to drive her home. But apparently he neglected to "step on it" enough and to watch for tails, since Luke Even Weimert was even followed by the bank's vice president for eight miles. This even gave the VP enough time to write down Luke Even Weimert's license plate number and car description. Can you say: Granny Busted!

Cops quickly pulled over the Jag and cuffed & stuffed Granny. Even Luke Even Weimert was arrested as well, although he was later released and not even charged after telling his even-handed story to the cops. But Granny's going to need some epsom salt for the hot water that she's in!

Granny's currently being held in the can and may have a longer stint in store in the state hoosegow since she's facing a bevy of felony charges. And to think -- she might have been able to escape arrest in the first place if she had just thought to bring along a frying pan on this piece of work.

http://www.kansascity.com/2010/12/15/2521879/kansas-woman-knocks-out.html

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2010/12/17/national/main7159663.shtml?tag=cbsnewsSectionContent.12

Ward, Don't You Think You Were a Little Hard On the Beaver? "Beaver Management Research" Among 1000s of Earmarks in Senate's Omnibus Spending Bill.

And make no mistake: Senators from both parties have contributed mightily to these earmarks. They total almost 7,000 in number and $8.3 billion in cost -- all buried in the massive, nearly 2000-page spending bill that Senate democrats are trying to jam through before the end of the weekend during the current lameduck session. It's as if these senators paid not an ounce of attention to the November midterm election results.

I don't have a sense yet for their chances of success (i.e. how many republicans may vote for this monstrosity), but regardless: If your senator (regardless of party) votes for this giant piece of pork, then I think you know whom not to vote for come the next election. I know I will.

It is necessary for Congress to pass an appropriations bill by this weekend, but all of these earmarks are absolutely not necessary. Get a load of some of the crazy waste in this piece of crap legislation, which includes huge expenditures on such items as:

-The aforementioned "beaver management research" (whatever that is).
-Blackbird management (we can't discriminate in favor of just beavers, I suppose).
-Harvesting salmon.
-Monitoring aquatic invasive species.
-Building solar parking canopies.
-Using the National Guard in Kentucky to "eradicate marijuana" (they have no police there? -- this one was proposed by GOP Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell).
-Polynesian Voyaging Society in Hawaii.
-Oyster safety (it's a dangerous world for oysters).
-Legume research in Idaho.
-Anthropod damage in Nevada (a Harry Reid special).
-A John Murtha Center in Pittsburgh.
-A Teddy Kennedy Institute in Massachusetts.
-Production of virus-free wine grapes.

With pork like all of that, who needs the swine industry anymore? Maybe studying that question can be the next earmark that these two parties toss into one of these bills.

UPDATE: Late today the news came down that Senate democrats have "abandoned" trying to push their massive omnibus spending bill through to a vote (put another way, I think it became clear to them that they would not be able to get enough GOP votes). While seemingly good news on its face, they still have to come up with (and quickly) some sort of appropriations bill to replace the abandoned bill. Let's just see what that new bill looks like and whether any of those ridiculous earmarks make their way into it.

http://lacrossetribune.com/news/opinion/article_d80be59e-08a3-11e0-927c-001cc4c03286.html
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1210/46404.html
http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=40633

Please Help Me, I'm Falling! Obama Reportedly Begs Dem Lawmakers For Votes on His "Tax Bill" Compromise w/ GOP, Saying His Presidency Depends On It.

If Obama truly believes his re-election turns on the passage of the "tax bill" (first link at bottom), then we have yet another example of Obama's completely inept political skills and perspective. First, if the "tax bill" did have widespread popularity throughout the country, then its failure would hardly be Obama's Waterloo (to borrow a deranged right-winger phrase from last year) since he has all the cover he needs: He tried to broker a compromise bill with the opposing party, but Congress (and he can blame members of both parties) shut him down.

Second, and more importantly, the "tax bill" does not have widespread approval in the country. Members of the far left -- hell-bent on pushing their mindless and incessant agenda of "hate the rich" and stick-it-to-the-wealthy even if it means raising taxes in the middle of a terrible recession -- hate the "tax bill." Plenty of people on the right, and many Independents alike (including myself), oppose this bill because it represents "business as usual" in Washington with all of its pork, earmarks and excessive spending completely unrelated to the issue of whether the current income tax rates should be kept in place.

In short, the outcome of the "tax bill," a full two years before the 2012 election, likely has minimal (if any) impact on Obama's chances for re-election. The fact that Obama apparently thinks otherwise illustrates yet again how Obama the great campaigner does not translate to Obama the smart politician in office. He makes political blunders and miscalculations at every turn. And that fact may be the only hope that republicans have for winning the presidency in 2012 -- since Lord knows they won't be putting up a particularly strong candidate against Obama.

http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/133909-obama-tells-lawmakers-not-passing-tax-deal-could-end-presidency-dem-says
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h1TCwd8a780

Now For Your Long-Range Forecast:Hard Time in the Pokey? Weather Babe in the Big Apple Faces Rainy Outlook After Allegedly Fabricating Rape Story.

Her name is Heidi Jones, and she's a weather gal on WABC/Channel 7 in New York City. You may have also seen her on Good Morning America, where she's been a fill-in weather chick. But her skies have darkened now that cops have busted her for "perpetrating the ultimate snow job" -- giving police an allegedly false account of being the victim of an attempted rape (link to full New York Post story at bottom).

Heidi likes to jog. She runs in marathons, even sometimes broadcasting live while she runs them. So it would come as no surprise that she would be jogging in Manhattan's Central Park one afternoon in September. But the rest of her story reportedly "proved to be as unreliable as a five-day forecast."

She told cops that on that occasion, an Hispanic man grabbed her, dragged her into the woods and tried to rape her, only to have the rape thwarted by two mysterious passers-by (the ghosts of John Lennon & Babe Ruth, perhaps?). (BTW, nice of her to throw in the Hispanic angle -- after all, white dudes never commit rape, right?).

Heidi also told cops that the same Hispanic mystery man "somehow found her again" two months later and continued his harassment ("I know you went to police," she quoted the enigmatic hoodlum as saying). But the entire story was "all wet," reports The Post.

One issue was the fact that Heidi didn't report any of this until late November -- two months after the initial alleged attack in the park. It probably also didn't help that on the day of the second alleged incident, Heidi hit Twitter with the following happy tweet: "Here is ur turkey day forecast! Gobble gobble!"

After cops investigated her story and starting confronting her with inconsistencies, Heidi reportedly folded like a K-Mart deck chair in a summer typhoon. The Post reports that she admitted to cops that she concocted the whole sorry story, blaming the tall tale on her personal "plea for sympathy" following some mysterious, unspecified "setback" in her personal life.

But even that excuse may not fly much higher than a low-level stratus cloud: The Post reports that Heidi's myriad public posts on Facebook and Twitter "have been bright and sunny for weeks." Put another way: Setback-schmetback.

At the moment, Heidi is charged with filing a false report and could face up to a year in the joint. WABC has suspended her as a reported first step towards giving her the axe. And I'd assume that the GMA gig has also been swept away faster than a Mississippi $hithouse in a 500-year flood.

But at least Heidi was accurate on one part of her dismal forecast: On the day the cops slapped the ol' cuffs on her, she posted the following on Facebook: "You guys ready for the arctic chill? Ready or Not . . . Be careful!"

http://www.newyorkpost.com/p/news/local/wabc_weather_gal_in_rape_lie_cops_Dt6rDzCTktzVPJ049g2YlO

"It's Real, Damn You!" Man Allegedly Fires Squirrel at Hardees Drive-Thru Gal After Ordering "Extra Nuts" Instead of Thickburger for His Furry Friend.

America's drive-thrus are out of control! Last week (as detailed in this space) it was some teenager in Cali allegedly tossing a scalding plate of food back through a drive-thru window, and this week it's 26-year-old Chris Thompson (pictured on left) allegedly heaving a dead squirrel at an Illinois Hardees drive-thru employee who questioned whether the rodent was real (link to full story at bottom). I guess some people really take it personally if you question the reality of their favorite pet.

In a case that cops have labeled as "Male Threw Dead Animal Through Drive Thru Window," cops say that Thompson was introduced to his little deceased pal when a friend put the squirrel on the dash of Thompson's car as a "prank." Apparently taking a real liking to the creature, Thompson took to driving around with it.

Then he hit the Hardees drive-thru for some "grub" and tried to introduce the animal to drive-thru gal Deborah Roberts. She says that Thompson "began to pet the squirrel and make it talk to the female employees" inside the Hardees. How Thompson "made it talk" is not revealed in the story, but my assumption (absent some buddy in the backseat throwing his voice) is that Thompson was working some sort of lame-ass ventriloquist act.

Next Thompson reportedly tried to place an order of "extra nuts for his squirrel" while continuing to pet the deceased critter. And that's when all hell broke loose! The drive-thru lady -- not believing that everything in this picture was on the up and up (squirrels typically don't speak English, after all) -- starting giving a Thompson a big hassle over whether the squirrel was real.

At that, Thompson apparently flipped his lid. "Yes it is real!", he barked at the drive-thru lady and then proceeded to fire the animal's corpse through the drive-thru window right at the woman. Thompson's now been charged with disorderly conduct. The local police chief is quoted as saying that his department takes "incidents like this seriously" and that "such behavior would not be condoned" in his town.

However, Thompson is not without a defense (of course!). He says he thought the drive-thru window would automatically close if something was thrown at it and would "not allow the squirrel to enter the business." Put another, I guess, he's saying he only intended the dead animal to bounce off the drive-thru window and land on the pavement below (where it would welcome subsequent drive-thru patrons). Nothing "disorderly" about that!

As for the squirrel, a customer inside the restaurant (why not an employee?!?) reportedly went "beyond the call of duty, removed the animal and placed it in the snow outside the eatery" (as pictured above). That's where cops found it and snapped some photos for evidence. No word on whether or not cops bothered to give the animal a proper Christian burial after taking their pictures. Poor squirrel.

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/documents/animals/dead-squirrel-tossed-drive-thru-window

Michelle Obama to American Kids: You Need to Eat Better So That You'll Be Healthy Enough to Go Fight in Wars!

Appearing today to speak in favor of the "Healthy, Hunger Free Kids Act of 2010" -- under which the federal government will regulate school lunches -- Michelle Obama spouted these rather mindless words concerning the alleged necessity of improving the diets of American children:

“Military leaders … tell us that when more than one in four young people are unqualified for military service because of their weight. Childhood obesity isn’t just a public health threat, it’s not just an economic threat, it’s a national security threat as well."

Gee, that's funny! I didn't realize we had returned to the Vietnam War era, complete with a military draft, and in which the federal government felt it necessary for most American men to be ready to go fight somewhere. I had thought that our volunteer military was staffed just fine these days? But I guess not. Instead, we need the federal government to whip our kids' diets into shape because they may just be needed for military induction and fighting sometime soon!

BTW, can you imagine if anyone other than a liberal democrat had uttered such moronic blather -- calling kids' diets a "national security" issue? Because after all, military bravado and waging wars are just fine with the far left and the American mainstream media just so long as a democrat is president at the time, right!

Oh, and just for good measure, Michelle says today that it's also necessary for the federal government to control school lunches because "we can't just leave it up to the parents" to look out for the diets of their children. Well, Ms. Obama, the Hell We Can't! It is the job of parents to feed their kids at home and -- if the parents have a problem with what's being served at school -- to provide their kids with a different lunch to bring. This is most certainly not a proper area for more overbearing federal government intrusion and regulation.

At the end of the day, this is all just more classic liberalism from the Obamas and their 20-percenter party. They know what's best for us. They will take care of us. We are stupid. The federal government is smart. We need only keep our mouths shut, bend over, and take their infinite wisdom right up our keysters. Well, I say, as always, nuts to that leftist shit!

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1210/46303.html
http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/michelle-obama-45-billion-child-nutritio