data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8766d/8766d29bd8105d4e27da3be5812bc26f428cb004" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/db032/db032cadda37c65a0324d7d8a4ff1ab3e03699c2" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5070d/5070d4d051150a7fe640ac41bb5f739dbc55c590" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0a980/0a980dc76f361c471771dddaf1b5473e16dd1f1c" alt=""
Put another way, and to quote NFL replay nomenclature, the evidence was too “inconclusive” to support a finding that Favre donged a pic of his package to Sterger’s cellphone. More specifically, Godfather Goodell says that he “could not conclude” that Favre committed that act since “forensic analysis” failed to “establish” conclusively that Favre donged the X-rated snapshots of Mr. Johnson to Ms. Sterger.
In the carefully worded language of Boss Goodell, neither Favre nor Sterger was exonerated nor convicted with respect to their stories. In short, Don Vito Goodell threw up his hands and screamed, “I’ve had enough ‘a this – whatsamatta wid you?” He then threw the case out of court, only slapping Favre on the wrist for his failure to cooperate with the investigation as much as the NFL might have liked.
So what’s the truth here? Who the hell knows. But it’s been a very funny (and page-view-friendly) story to follow. Methinks (and I am speculating) that Goodfella Goodell knows damn well what the truth is, but for whatever reasons is falling back to the ol’ “hung verdict” excuse. But hell, what do I really care? This is all total tabloid crap to begin with (and as stated, great for page views! Must it end?!?).
http://www.latimes.com/sports/la-sp-nfl-report-20101230,0,2986880.story