I'm frankly not sure how "Wasserman" Simpson has made it this long as democrat party Chairman. She's not exactly what you'd call an appealing face of the leftist party, and her steady stream of lunatic-like gaffes make me think this broad's a few chains short of a Biden (most recently: "Wasserman" Simpson compared right-winger tea partiers to wife beaters).
But her ineffective leadership of the party seems to be the least of her problems. As reported in this week's Politico, democrat party partisans have "turned" on "Wasserman" Simpson for a whole host of reasons, not the least of which are her repeated efforts the past two years to get the party "to cover the costs of her wardrobe."
"Wasserman" Simpson's begging has reportedly included conniving in 2012 for a new free wardrobe for the democrat party National Convention, in 2013 for Mr. 38%'s second inauguration, and again in 2013 for the White House Lackeys' (errrr, Correspondents') Dinner! All such overtures, apparently, were rebuffed by the democrat party (leastways atop the table).
But here's my question: WHY deny this old battle axe some new stitches? Why NOT extend the entitlement state straight to her highly entitled DC front door?
I mean, just take a gander at this silly bastard up above! What, with her steel-stringer hairdo, beady little eyes, gun moll green earrings, and that necklace looking like a yank-chain from an Alabama shithouse...
If ever there was a creature who could use a little charity in the ol' wardrobe department, I'd think it would be this broad. Why not show a little more compassion, democrat party? Your stinginess towards this woman is rather unbecoming.
http://www.politico.com/story/2014/09/democrats-debbie-wasserman-schultz-111077.html?hp=t1_3
Posts
