http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D985I63O1&show_article=1
I'm struggling to think of a more absurd proposition that has occurred since His Majesty exchanged yucks and laughs with a despicable totalarian dictator from down south way. I do recognize the political convenience and advantage to such a move -- transfer perhaps the biggest Jackass appointment His Majesty has made so far (which is really saying something) from Homeland Security to a place where she never appears on camera and can keep a much lower profile for several years -- BUT PLEASE!
I can only imagine the Napolitano-written decisions we would get 35-40 years from now (i.e. the first point in time when the other justices would actually allow her sorry ass (errrrrr, her law clerk) to write a majority opinion). I think it would go something like this: "[IN A BIG, DEEP, STUFFY, COMPLETELY CONDESCENDING VOICE:] While the 14th Amendment does say that no person's life, liberty or property shall be deprived without due process of law, the defendant here, in tying up a public sidewalk in an alleged effort to assert his right-wing extremist viewpoints as a part of what we have been informed is connected to the so-called 'teabagger movement,' voted for a third party in the last election and, moreover, used such non-protected speech items as 'swine flu' and 'terrorism', and for that reason, we the majority hereby recognize a new exception to the plain language of the 14th Amendment. It is hereby articulated as follows: Do the tea bag, and the constitutional protections shall lag."
But more simply put: that Napolitano would ever receive consideration for the USSC for even as long as it takes to break wind in an Alabama Shithouse shows a reckless disregard for the best interests of this country and just exemplifies, once again as I've been saying, that His Majesty represents about as much change as the tin cup of a Grand Avenue Kansas City panhandler. Hardly change we can believe in. More of the same as far as I'm concerned.