You know it's a pretty rotten and sad state of affairs in the United States when even a disgusting sleazebucket like Iranian "President" Mahmoud Ahmadinejad can spot and articulate the biggest crisis currently facing America, and in accurate, yet less-than-optimal terms -- while the individual in charge here is completely oblivious to our massive debt and its consequences.
But look what we got over here: A "president" of our own who on Jon Stewart this week characterized the Libyan Benghazi terror attack as a situation where, "If four Americans get killed, it's not optimal." Wonder what he'd say if 10, 20, 30 people had been killed? That it's "less-than-perfect"? Or maybe, "not so ideal"?
Not to mention, of course, if maybe only one person had been killed, or perhaps if there'd just been a few good maimings, or maybe if the male ambassador had only been raped, things would've been a decent amount more optimal.
Or also more optimal it would be, methinks, if Barack Oblivious could still credibly blame the Benghazi attack on a spontaneous demonstration sparked by "the video." Now that would be pretty freakin' optimal! But when dishonest cover stories head way south: You get stuck with Bizarro World optimal, unfortunately.
http://www.jpost.com/IranianThreat/News/Article.aspx?id=288322
http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/262901-obama-on-benghazi-when-four-americans-get-killed-its-not-optimal
I'M THE RAGER, AND I APPROVED THIS POST.
Posts
